Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Burbank

North Hollywood, CA · ~135 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burbank runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Burbank: 6.4 TCR = 99% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burbank safety composite

Burbank scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2019→2020

Burbank injury rate improved

Burbank's TCR fell 1.4 from 7.1 in 2019 to 5.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.1 · 2020=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · North Hollywood, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.4 · 99% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #176/710
  • PHOTO Mountain View
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mountain View (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Burbank in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burbank averages 6.4 TCR (99% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burbank TCR series: 2019=7.1 · 2020=5.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Burbank falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Burbank (135 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Burbank
Burbank (135 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Burbank has more employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.7 3.6 5 3 1
2019 7.1 2.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · North Hollywood

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 121 employers in North Hollywood, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mountain View 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - KILN 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - RSW5 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HMI2 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vino Vid Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Lemon Association - Oxnard 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers LP | Bakersfield Packinghouse 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pak Avocado 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 452 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-047 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR SADA Systems LLC 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armorcast Products Company 418 FTE
NAT-TCR Ansted Center 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Monarch Adult Autism Program 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LewisGale Medical Center 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Emmet D Williams Elementary School 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millett 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broomfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teays Valley Center 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.