Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis · Wisconsin

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4)

Beaver Dam, WI · ~103 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis workplace, earning a grade B.

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4): 1.9 TCR = 56% of Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) safety composite

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2021

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) injury rate improved

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4)'s TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332117 · Beaver Dam, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/14
  • PHOTO Keystone Powdered Me…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Keystone Powdered Metal Company Troutman (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) falls in its industry

151 Powder metallurgy products man establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 14 Powder metallurgy products man employers in Wisconsin.

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) (103 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4)
Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) (103 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 4) has more employees than the Powder metallurgy products manufactured median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 2.9 4 0 0
2018 4.5 3.3 4 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 1.9 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332117 · WI · Beaver Dam

151 Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 59 employers in Beaver Dam, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Keystone Powdered Metal Company Troutman 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mi-Tech Tungsten Metals, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mott Corporation HQ 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coldwater Sintered Metal Products, Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wysocki Produce Farm - Plainfield 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE INTREN, LLC - WISCONSIN 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Immel Construction 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carnivore Meat Company 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7039 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7039 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- Beaver Dam 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR BDCH 602 FTE
NAT-TCR Cornerstone Hospital 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chandler Construction Services, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Roses Express 1869 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Roses 127 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Progressive Dynamics Enterprises LCC 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jlh Hickory Limited Partnership 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Flight 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE TTM Technologies 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.