Institutional building construction general contractors · New York

Burgio and Campofelice

Elma, NY · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burgio and Campofelice runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Institutional building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Burgio and Campofelice: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Institutional building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burgio and Campofelice safety composite

Burgio and Campofelice scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Burgio and Campofelice held a steady TCR band

Burgio and Campofelice's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Elma, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/218
  • PHOTO Holder Construction …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holder Construction Group, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Burgio and Campofelice in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burgio and Campofelice averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Institutional building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burgio and Campofelice TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Burgio and Campofelice falls in its industry

4,692 Institutional building constru establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 218 Institutional building constru employers in New York.

Burgio and Campofelice (22 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Burgio and Campofelice
Burgio and Campofelice (22 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Burgio and Campofelice has fewer employees than the Institutional building construction gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Elma

4,692 Institutional building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 15 employers in Elma, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holder Construction Group, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvey-Cleary Builders - Austin 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RKRedding Construction Company, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rycon Construction, Inc. - Atlanta 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turek Farms Management Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Cattle LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgecrest Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Affinity Agriculture LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steuben Foods Incorporated 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Servotronics, Inc 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR GYPSUM SYSTEMS, LLC. 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Maple Court 157 FTE
NAT-TCR John Burns Construction Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S05688 - WM of Washington MA Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Operations Services, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR sheckler excavating inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gibson Plumbing, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highwoods Contracting Corporation 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakley Fertilizer, Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakley Pendleton Warehouse 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.