Distribution of electric power · Vermont

Burlington Electric Department

Burlington, VT · ~111 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burlington Electric Department runs at 831% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Burlington Electric Department: 10.0 TCR = 831% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burlington Electric Department safety composite

Burlington Electric Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2022→2024

Burlington Electric Department injury rate improved

Burlington Electric Department's TCR fell 9.0 from 15.9 in 2022 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=15.9 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Burlington, VT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 831% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO SANTA CRUZ SERVICE C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SANTA CRUZ SERVICE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Vermont employers → · Look up another →

Burlington Electric Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burlington Electric Department averages 10.0 TCR (831% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burlington Electric Department TCR series: 2022=15.9 · 2023=7 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Burlington Electric Department falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Vermont alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Distribution of electric power employers in Vermont.

Burlington Electric Department (111 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Burlington Electric Department
Burlington Electric Department (111 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Burlington Electric Department has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 5.0 7 0 0
2023 7.0 4.0 7 0 0
2022 15.9 14.9 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · VT · Burlington

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,065 rated employers in Vermont with headcount on file · 96 employers in Burlington, VT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SANTA CRUZ SERVICE CENTER 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEMC-Springfield 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springfield Area Office - 149 Power Company Rd. Springfield 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR James River District Office 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Town of Stowe 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE PVC:PV000 - PV000-Corp Office-N. Springfie 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koffee Kup Bakery, Inc. 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vermont Service Center 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard Center Inc 1,483 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102 South Winooski 529 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1138 Pine 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burton Corporation 414 FTE
NAT-TCR Terre Haute South 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Hills Health & Rehabilitation Center 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets - Columbia City 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Iah-Ground Ops 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE MacAllister Machinery Washington 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE NewCold Seattle Operations LLC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Expeditors International of Washington-Memphis 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.