Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Texas

Burlington Plant

Saginaw, TX · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burlington Plant runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Burlington Plant: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burlington Plant safety composite

Burlington Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Burlington Plant held a steady TCR band

Burlington Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Saginaw, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/46
  • PHOTO RathGibson LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RathGibson LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Burlington Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burlington Plant averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burlington Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Burlington Plant falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 46 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Texas.

Burlington Plant (28 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Burlington Plant
Burlington Plant (28 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Burlington Plant has fewer employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · TX · Saginaw

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 36 employers in Saginaw, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RathGibson LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CORTEC FLUID CONTROL 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaris Coiled Tubes 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accumetrics Limited 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5316 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5316 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTI Foods, LLC. Soups 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ventura Foods Fort Worth 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Peterson Roofing Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SRC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR County Attorney's Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lear Corporation - Building 200 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorado Springs Winnelson Supply 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Pallet Co. LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Masonry and Stoneworks Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Hills Farms, Inc. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.