Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade · Pennsylvania

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017)

Harmony, PA · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017): 4.1 TCR = 185% of Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) safety composite

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2018→2024

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) injury rate improved

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017)'s TCR fell 7.8 from 9.6 in 2018 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.6 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 425120 · Harmony, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 185% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO Las Vegas, NV Install
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Las Vegas, NV Install (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) averages 4.1 TCR (185% of the Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) TCR series: 2018=9.6 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) falls in its industry

243 Durable goods agents and broke establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Durable goods agents and broke employers in Pennsylvania.

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) (44 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017)
Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) (44 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Butler Refrigerated Meats (W017) has fewer employees than the Durable goods agents and brokers, wholes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.5 1.7 2 0 0
2021 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 5.2 3.5 3 0 0
2018 9.6 6.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

425120 · PA · Harmony

243 Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 26 employers in Harmony, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas, NV Install 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2904-SAS-OK 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2904-SAS-GA 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawaii 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milton Grove Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Donegal Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESSC West Shore Service Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Pittsburgh 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harmony Plant 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR BUTLER REFRIGERATED MEATS 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Made LLC. Harmony 131 FTE
NAT-TCR De Anza Tile 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TXH057 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Desert Valley Medical Group 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Statesville Assisted Living 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pohick Bay Regional Park 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE ERI Fresno, Suite 104 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marquart Bros, LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICE2 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.