Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) · Texas

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc.

El Paso, TX · ~160 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. runs at 413% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) workplace, earning a grade F.

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 413% of Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. safety composite

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2017

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. injury rate improved

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.0 from 4.4 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 518210 · El Paso, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 413% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO Location 48020
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Location 48020 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (413% of the Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=1.4 · BLS 0.7

Where Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. falls in its industry

180 Data processing services (exce establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Data processing services (exce employers in Texas.

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. (160 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc.
Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. (160 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6

Butterfield - DATAMARK, Inc. has fewer employees than the Data processing services (except payroll median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.4 1.9 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

518210 · TX · El Paso

180 Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Location 48020 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RagingWire TX 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Location 52004 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOCATION 23006 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LRM San Antonio 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc. 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ Citgo Corpus Christi 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Communications Specialists, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Flint St. Plant 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Front Royal (Vafrl) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Somerset (Kysom) 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peapod S&S South Setauket, Ny 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peapod S&S Medford, Ny 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison (Wimad) 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Urbana (Ilurb) 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.