Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · Maryland

Byco Enterprises, Inc

Grantsville, MD · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Byco Enterprises, Inc runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Byco Enterprises, Inc: 7.0 TCR = 250% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Byco Enterprises, Inc safety composite

Byco Enterprises, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Byco Enterprises, Inc: 4.5 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Byco Enterprises, Inc's TCR rose 0.7 from 4.5 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Grantsville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 250% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/34
  • PHOTO Doster Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Doster Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Byco Enterprises, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Byco Enterprises, Inc averages 7.0 TCR (250% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Byco Enterprises, Inc TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=7 · 2021=12.4 · 2022=14.5 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Byco Enterprises, Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 34 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in Maryland.

Byco Enterprises, Inc (29 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Byco Enterprises, Inc
Byco Enterprises, Inc (29 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Byco Enterprises, Inc has fewer employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 8.9 0.0 2 1 0
2022 14.5 10.9 4 0 0
2021 12.4 6.2 4 0 0
2020 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MD · Grantsville

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Grantsville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Doster Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Floyd Johnston Construction Co., Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pate Construction Company Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydro Resources - Mid-Continent, Inc. Las Cruces NM 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fort Smallwood 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frederick Division 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGL MD - Rockville 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Germantown 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beitzel Corporation 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOODWILL MENNONITE HOME 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grantsville Facility 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Closetmaid - Grantsville 190 FTE
NAT-TCR 10515 Clearwater 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 10257 Short Pump 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri-Mark, Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC Healthcare, Lawrenceburg 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Napa Winery Group, LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mangums Trucking LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landoll Company, LLC - Travalong 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unity Ambulette Corp. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.