Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · New York

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant

Syracuse, NY · ~307 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant: 9.8 TCR = 297% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant safety composite

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant: 10.8 → 12.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2019

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant's TCR rose 1.9 from 10.8 in 2016 to 12.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 297% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #36/43
  • PHOTO Westby Cooperative C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~307 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westby Cooperative Creamery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant averages 9.8 TCR (297% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=12.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 43 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in New York.

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant (307 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant
Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant (307 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Byrne Dairy Fluid milk Plant has more employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 12.8 9.3 29 1 0
2018 5.8 4.5 13 0 0
2016 10.8 8.2 37 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · NY · Syracuse

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westby Cooperative Creamery 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6962-SWY-0045-0045-08409 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plainview Milk Products Cooperative - Hastings 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy Fort Wayne 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plaza Construction New York 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1964-00130257 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Care, Inc. Kingston, NY 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY Corporate Office 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR CECO Concrete : Kansas City 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0027 3613 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson Health NJ - Washington Twp. - Formerly Kennedy Health 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Behavioral Healthcare Center 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Tigard Properties 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meritor 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain States Rosen Colorado 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electronics Plant 307 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.