Waste (except sewage) treatment facilities, nonhazardous · Michigan

Byron Center Facility

Byron Center, MI · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Byron Center Facility runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste (except sewage) treatment facilities, nonhazardous workplace, earning a grade F.

Byron Center Facility: 6.9 TCR = 265% of Waste (except sewage) treatment facilities, nonhazardous BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Byron Center Facility safety composite

Byron Center Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Byron Center Facility injury rate improved

Byron Center Facility's TCR fell 1.7 from 9.3 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562219 · Byron Center, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 265% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Stericycle - Hollist…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stericycle - Hollister,CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Byron Center Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Byron Center Facility averages 6.9 TCR (265% of the Waste (except sewage) treatment facilities, nonhazardous BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Byron Center Facility TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=6 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Byron Center Facility falls in its industry

171 Waste (except sewage) treatmen establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Waste (except sewage) treatmen employers in Michigan.

Byron Center Facility (75 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Byron Center Facility
Byron Center Facility (75 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Byron Center Facility has more employees than the Waste (except sewage) treatment faciliti median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 5.7 7 1 0
2023 6.0 4.0 5 1 0
2022 6.6 5.5 6 0 0
2021 5.1 3.8 3 1 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 8.0 6.7 6 0 0
2018 8.2 2.7 4 2 0
2017 9.8 6.5 6 0 0
2016 9.3 7.7 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562219 · MI · Byron Center

171 Waste (except sewage) treatment facilities, nonhazardous employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 78 employers in Byron Center, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Hollister,CA 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Reserve,LA 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Dale,TX 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Clinton,IL 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE McCarthy & Smith Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Companies INC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE P.J. Steel 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baker Construction Company Inc 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buist Electric 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lumbermen's Inc. Byron Center 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masterpiece Flower Company LLC 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Van Eerden Trucking 254 FTE
NAT-TCR Kenosha 27 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Book Fairs - Milwaukee 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Feroleto Steel Company Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Felker Brothers Corporation 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Park 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artone LLC 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE O&R Blue Hill 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.