Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Pennsylvania

C-B Tool Co.

Lancaster, PA · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C-B Tool Co. runs at 453% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade F.

C-B Tool Co.: 14.9 TCR = 453% of Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C-B Tool Co. safety composite

C-B Tool Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.1

2017→2024

C-B Tool Co. injury rate improved

C-B Tool Co.'s TCR fell 23.1 from 23.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 40.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=23.1 · 2018=24.7 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=40.1 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 453% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/35
  • PHOTO Edgerton Forge, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgerton Forge, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

C-B Tool Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C-B Tool Co. averages 14.9 TCR (453% of the Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C-B Tool Co. TCR series: 2017=23.1 · 2018=24.7 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=40.1 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where C-B Tool Co. falls in its industry

241 Cold forgings made from purcha establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 35 Cold forgings made from purcha employers in Pennsylvania.

C-B Tool Co. (21 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate C-B Tool Co.
C-B Tool Co. (21 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

C-B Tool Co. has fewer employees than the Cold forgings made from purchased iron o median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2022 10.8 10.8 2 0 0
2021 11.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 40.1 25.1 8 0 0
2019 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 24.7 0.0 6 0 0
2017 23.1 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · PA · Lancaster

241 Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgerton Forge, Inc. 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&H Industries - Main Facility 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ulven Forging Incorporated 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Forge Division of Powers and Sons LLC 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smiling Porker 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-PA Dairy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Carolina Hangar 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Frackville 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0649 Towson 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0561 Boston 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0734 Norcross 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0682 Northbrook 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Presidio Contracting, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entergy Aviation N.O. Airport 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterman 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE DACO 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.