Commercial building construction · Georgia

C & H Industrial Services

Dalton, GA · ~93 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C & H Industrial Services runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

C & H Industrial Services: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C & H Industrial Services safety composite

C & H Industrial Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

C & H Industrial Services injury rate improved

C & H Industrial Services's TCR fell 1.9 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Dalton, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/121
  • PHOTO TCCo-MD
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TCCo-MD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

C & H Industrial Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C & H Industrial Services averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C & H Industrial Services TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.9

Where C & H Industrial Services falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 121 Commercial building constructi employers in Georgia.

C & H Industrial Services (93 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate C & H Industrial Services
C & H Industrial Services (93 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

C & H Industrial Services has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · GA · Dalton

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 292 employers in Dalton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TCCo-MD 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Braun Construction Group 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Noble Construction Group, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Benning Construction Company 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Electric Company Inc 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE H & F Bread Co DBA Ideation Atlanta 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton Medical Center 1,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 97 1,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD 1,224 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA Dalton GA Antioch 1,077 FTE
NAT-TCR PC Connection Wilmington 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresno Stratas Foods 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Becton Dickinson Caribe LTD. Biosciences 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR William Grant & Sons Inc. NYC Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0758 College Park 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millwork Brothers, Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acero Precision 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quicksilver Contracting Co 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.