General warehousing and storage · Wisconsin

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI

Pleasant Prairie, WI · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI: 9.8 TCR = 169% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI safety composite

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2016→2019

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI injury rate improved

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI's TCR fell 10.3 from 17.8 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.8 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Pleasant Prairie, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.8 · 169% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #163/195
  • PHOTO Rock Hill Distributi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rock Hill Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI averages 9.8 TCR (169% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI TCR series: 2016=17.8 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=9 · 2019=7.4 · BLS 5.8

Where C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #163 safest of 195 General warehousing and storag employers in Wisconsin.

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI (53 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI
C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI (53 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

C & H Services - Pleasant Prairie, WI has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.4 7.4 5 0 0
2018 9.0 7.5 6 0 0
2017 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2016 17.8 13.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · WI · Pleasant Prairie

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 97 employers in Pleasant Prairie, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rock Hill Distribution Center 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Warehouse Inc 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PODS Norwood, MA 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4538-8810 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coello & Associates, inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwing Systems Integration, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert J. Nickles, Inc 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSI Electrical Contractors, Inc 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office - H1 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9555 - 76th Street 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate (H2) 784 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate (H1) 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Cushwa Plant 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McKey Perforating TN 355 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR #578 South Plainfield Shoprite 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Rosa Health & Rehabilitation 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal CG - Casa Grande CG 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Middlesex 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriMark Gill 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6962-Swy 0045 8273 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.