Commercial building construction general contractors · California

C. Overaa & Co.

Richmond, CA · ~444 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C. Overaa & Co. runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

C. Overaa & Co.: 1.2 TCR = 41% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C. Overaa & Co. safety composite

C. Overaa & Co. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2023

C. Overaa & Co. injury rate improved

C. Overaa & Co.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Richmond, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #117/486
  • PHOTO Carl Belt Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~444 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carl Belt Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

C. Overaa & Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C. Overaa & Co. averages 1.2 TCR (41% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C. Overaa & Co. TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=1 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 2.9

Where C. Overaa & Co. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 486 Commercial building constructi employers in California.

C. Overaa & Co. (444 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate C. Overaa & Co.
C. Overaa & Co. (444 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

C. Overaa & Co. has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.6 3 0 0
2021 2.4 1.2 10 0 0
2020 0.7 0.5 3 0 0
2019 1.1 0.7 5 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 4 0 0
2017 1.8 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Richmond

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carl Belt Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FCL Builders Maryland, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryan Companies US, Inc. - Corporate 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beatrice - Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE XL Construction 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cacique Inc. 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6768-67680038-1190 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schlosser Forge - Rancho Cucamonga 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR ISD# 834-Stillwater High School 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Honda Cars of Katy 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HRC Sedona Pinion Pointe 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northland Aluminum Products, Inc 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dominos 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE R.H. White Construction 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monogram Comfort Foods LLC 444 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.