Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Missouri

C R Metal Products, Inc

Saint Louis, MO · ~104 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C R Metal Products, Inc runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

C R Metal Products, Inc: 5.6 TCR = 169% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C R Metal Products, Inc safety composite

C R Metal Products, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2020

C R Metal Products, Inc injury rate improved

C R Metal Products, Inc's TCR fell 2.3 from 7.5 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Saint Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 169% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #17/19
  • PHOTO Hobson Fabricating c…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hobson Fabricating corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

C R Metal Products, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C R Metal Products, Inc averages 5.6 TCR (169% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C R Metal Products, Inc TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where C R Metal Products, Inc falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 19 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Missouri.

C R Metal Products, Inc (104 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate C R Metal Products, Inc
C R Metal Products, Inc (104 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

C R Metal Products, Inc has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.2 3.1 5 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2018 8.1 2.7 9 0 0
2017 3.5 2.7 4 0 0
2016 7.5 2.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · MO · Saint Louis

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 448 employers in Saint Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hobson Fabricating corp. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR James F. Mullen Co. Inc 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBM INC. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR APX Enclosures, Inc. 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2080-Matthews, MO (Monsanto Co.) 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE BSI Constructors 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Versa-Tags, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR MO002 12,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnes-Jewish Hospital 9,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR Checkerboard Square 3,464 FTE
NAT-TCR Hancock Concrete Products, LLC- Courtland 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Medspeed Sioux Fall 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : PIT - Pittsburgh 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Beltmann Relocation Group - Pompano Beach, FL 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE OH017 Lebanon, OH Corrugated (PAX) 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mesquite Country Enterprises LP 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Glenn Middle School 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : SNA - Santa Ana 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.