General Warehousing and Storage · California

CA - Adidas (Colton)

Colton, CA · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA - Adidas (Colton) runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

CA - Adidas (Colton): 2.5 TCR = 43% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA - Adidas (Colton) safety composite

CA - Adidas (Colton) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CA - Adidas (Colton): 2.2 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.08× in 2023

CA - Adidas (Colton)'s TCR rose 3.0 from 2.2 in 2020 to 5.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Colton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 43% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #324/1131
  • PHOTO 50012 CAPSTONE CVS L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 50012 CAPSTONE CVS LUMBERTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA - Adidas (Colton) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA - Adidas (Colton) averages 2.5 TCR (43% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA - Adidas (Colton) TCR series: 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 5.8

Where CA - Adidas (Colton) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #324 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

CA - Adidas (Colton) (74 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CA - Adidas (Colton)
CA - Adidas (Colton) (74 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

CA - Adidas (Colton) has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Colton

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 95 employers in Colton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 50012 CAPSTONE CVS LUMBERTON 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-501 W. Daneldale Road 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KYHBR - SCS-HEBRON BLDG K - 2741 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1451 GEORGIA COASTAL HOLDING FACILITY 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Orchards-New Columbia 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apricot Lane Farms 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central California Almond Growers (Kerman) 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jose Jesus Garcia Jr 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arrowhead Regional Medical Center 1,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 294 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 287 1,342 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 290 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR Panda Management, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayo Clinic Health System-Pharmacy & Home Medical (Westgate) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4680 Adrian, MI 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4517 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jerry Durant CBG, LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wilson Bohannan Company 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legacy at Maiden Park 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE H1div-Ph-H1 Division 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.