Cable and Other Subscription Programming · California

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A

Concord, CA · ~162 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.8
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A runs at 3114% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable and Other Subscription Programming workplace, earning a grade F.

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A: 21.8 TCR = 3114% of Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A safety composite

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2022→2023

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A injury rate improved

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A's TCR fell 7.0 from 25.3 in 2022 to 18.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=25.3 · 2023=18.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Concord, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 21.8 · 3114% of ind

  • DART 17.6 DART
  • RANK #31/42
  • PHOTO CA - Fairfield, 5133…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA - Fairfield, 5133 Fulton Dr (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A averages 21.8 TCR (3114% of the Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A TCR series: 2022=25.3 · 2023=18.3 · BLS 0.7

Where CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A falls in its industry

455 Cable and Other Subscription P establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 42 Cable and Other Subscription P employers in California.

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A (162 employees, TCR 21.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A
CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A (162 employees, TCR 21.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CA - Concord, 2500 BATES AVE # A has fewer employees than the Cable and Other Subscription Programming median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 18.3 17.6 15 11 0
2022 25.3 24.0 12 26 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CA · Concord

455 Cable and Other Subscription Programming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 201 employers in Concord, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA - Fairfield, 5133 Fulton Dr 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Salinas, 710 La Guardia St 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Yuba City, 311 B St 22.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - San Rafael, 1111 Andersen Dr 21.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers | Reedley Packinghouse 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE M and R Company 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alsco Geyer Irrigation, Inc. 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - San Diego 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-01 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 403 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gonsalves and Santucci 1,551 FTE
NAT-TCR The W Senior Living at Goshen 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Your Neighborhood Deliveries Inc 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Powder coating Inc. 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ARCA InterCare Service South Valley A & B 21.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flight Center Hotel LLC 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brightmoor Nursing Center 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daisy Brand-Wooster 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eliada Homes, Inc. 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.