Utility Company · California

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office

Santa Clarita, CA · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office runs at 582% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility Company workplace, earning a grade F.

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office: 7.0 TCR = 582% of Utility Company BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office safety composite

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office held a steady TCR band

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office's TCR held near 0.3 from 6.1 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=18.4 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Santa Clarita, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 582% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #69/69
  • PHOTO Eversource - Epping
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - Epping (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office averages 7.0 TCR (582% of the Utility Company BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=18.4 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 1.2

Where CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office falls in its industry

263 Utility Company establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 69 Utility Company employers in California.

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office (41 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office
CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office (41 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

CA-N. Trans/Sub Regl Office has fewer employees than the Utility Company median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 2.1 2 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.7 6.5 3 1 0
2021 18.4 13.8 7 1 0
2020 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2017 8.6 6.4 3 1 0
2016 6.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · CA · Santa Clarita

263 Utility Company employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 115 employers in Santa Clarita, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Epping 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Truckee Donner Public Utility District 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Carmel Public Utility Co. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amarillo Operations Center-104 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 528 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Princess Cruise Lines LTD 1,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR 058101-SANTA CLARITA CA P&DC 958 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Master's University and Seminary 829 FTE
NAT-TCR The Florida Aquarium 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nmalb - Albuquerque 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Varoa - Roanoke Hub 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Flfmb - Baymeadows 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0110 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0468 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0348 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0627 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.