Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing · California

CA-San Diego

San Diego, CA · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-San Diego runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CA-San Diego: 2.3 TCR = 71% of Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-San Diego safety composite

CA-San Diego scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2017→2024

CA-San Diego injury rate improved

CA-San Diego's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.3 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/35
  • PHOTO Southwire Company Av…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southwire Company Avon Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-San Diego in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-San Diego averages 2.3 TCR (71% of the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-San Diego TCR series: 2017=7.3 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CA-San Diego falls in its industry

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 35 Digital test equipment (e.g., employers in California.

CA-San Diego (95 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-San Diego
CA-San Diego (95 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

CA-San Diego has more employees than the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.4 3.4 11 0 0
2018 6.1 4.1 11 1 0
2017 7.3 4.7 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · CA · San Diego

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southwire Company Avon Lake 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bruker Middleton 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doble Engineering - Marlboro, MA 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auto Meter Products Inc 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Del Llano Farms 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Los Altos Farms, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE TreeSource 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa View Farms 2 (Madera) 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Bhavi Motel LLC - New Jersey 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethlehem, PA - Easton Road 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Celebration 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE GST Inc 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transportation : Miami - Trans 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt Angel 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avera Health Avera St Lukes Hospital Campus 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.