Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · California

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center

Richmond, CA · ~693 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade F.

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center: 8.7 TCR = 211% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center safety composite

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2021→2022

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center injury rate improved

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center's TCR fell 3.6 from 10.5 in 2021 to 6.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.5 · 2022=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 211% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #44/69
  • PHOTO Bakkavor Foods USA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 123 inj
  • SIZE ~693 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bakkavor Foods USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center averages 8.7 TCR (211% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center TCR series: 2021=10.5 · 2022=6.9 · BLS 4.1

Where CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 69 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in California.

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center (693 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center
CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center (693 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

CA01 - Richmond Fulfillment Center has more employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.9 6.4 31 1 0
2021 10.5 9.7 92 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · CA · Richmond

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bakkavor Foods USA 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bakkavor Carson USA 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GreenGate Fresh LLLP Yuma 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simply Fresh Foods 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAHPADM01 693 FTE
STATE-SIZE Police Main Station 693 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rohr Inc (Riverside CA) 694 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2045-00006W 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZSTF 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 321 Terminal 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Health and Rehabilitation Center 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Foods Fort Mill 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anmed Health North Campus 693 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Paper Lewistion PPD 693 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Troy OH) 693 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capsugel 693 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.