wired telecommunication carriers · California

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200

Riverside, CA · ~518 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 runs at 827% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade F.

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200: 5.8 TCR = 827% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 safety composite

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 held a steady TCR band

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200's TCR held near 0.0 from 6.3 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.3 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Riverside, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 827% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #14/42
  • PHOTO PA - Beaver Falls, 2…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~518 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PA - Beaver Falls, 2810 Darlington Rd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 averages 5.8 TCR (827% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 TCR series: 2022=6.3 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 0.7

Where CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 42 wired telecommunication carrie employers in California.

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 (518 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200
CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 (518 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CA_Riverside_7337 Central Ave_CA4310200 has more employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 4.1 32 2 0
2023 4.7 3.5 24 0 0
2022 6.3 2.2 30 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CA · Riverside

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PA - Beaver Falls, 2810 Darlington Rd 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN - Brooklyn Park, 6901 Winnetka Ave N 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL - Fort Pierce, 2765 Peters Rd 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL - Pompano Beach, 141 NW 16th St 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DEL PACIFICO FARM LABOR SERVICES INC 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rancho Laguna Farms LLC 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJ - 001 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decker Electric 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR Brooklyn Park Mn - 3333 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoebe Berks Health Care Center and Phoebe Berks Comm 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Subaru of Fort Myers 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TLG-Evansville 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carvana Blue Mound 518 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaglk - 35 Glenlake Building 518 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenview Innovation Center 518 FTE
NAT-SIZE R. H. Sheppard Co., Inc. 518 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.