Cabinets, kitchen (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing · Alabama

Cabinet Component Innovations

Bessemer, AL · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cabinet Component Innovations runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cabinets, kitchen (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Cabinet Component Innovations: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Cabinets, kitchen (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cabinet Component Innovations safety composite

Cabinet Component Innovations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2018

Cabinet Component Innovations injury rate improved

Cabinet Component Innovations's TCR fell 3.0 from 7.5 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2018=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337110 · Bessemer, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO Candlelight Cabinetr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Candlelight Cabinetry, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Cabinet Component Innovations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cabinet Component Innovations averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Cabinets, kitchen (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cabinet Component Innovations TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2018=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Cabinet Component Innovations falls in its industry

508 Cabinets, kitchen (except free establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Cabinets, kitchen (except free employers in Alabama.

Cabinet Component Innovations (79 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cabinet Component Innovations
Cabinet Component Innovations (79 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Cabinet Component Innovations has more employees than the Cabinets, kitchen (except freestanding), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.5 0.0 3 0 0
2016 7.5 6.4 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337110 · AL · Bessemer

508 Cabinets, kitchen (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 116 employers in Bessemer, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Candlelight Cabinetry, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cabinet Components 1, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select Euro Systems, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Dallas 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastern Division Anniston Complex 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Alabama Paving Company, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE DD - DARBY DOORS 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairfield Works - Flat Rolled 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BHM1 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bessemer, DC 768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blox LLC 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR US PIPE - BHM-DIP 559 FTE
NAT-TCR CC-Reno LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Affco Deli Provisions, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Disposal - Melrose Park Hauling 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR #506 East Windsor Shoprite 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #130 (River Falls, WI) 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #17 (St Cloud, MN (West)) 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #177 (Green Bay, WI (Suamico)) 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCX North Carolina 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.