Commercial building construction general contractors · California

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc.: 10.4 TCR = 358% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. safety composite

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc.: 8.3 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2018

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.0 from 8.3 in 2017 to 12.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 358% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #454/486
  • PHOTO Building Engineering…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Building Engineering and Maintenance, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. averages 10.4 TCR (358% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=12.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #454 safest of 486 Commercial building constructi employers in California.

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cable Links Construction Group, Inc.
Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Cable Links Construction Group, Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 12.4 9.3 4 0 0
2017 8.3 5.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Fresno

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Building Engineering and Maintenance, Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1053 - BELFOR San Diego CA 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Ness and Geary Campus 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8899 Beverly 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Sherwood Foods-Ohio 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR N44-Tow-Rdu - Towmark 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1082 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix - MB 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0055 - El Paso, Tx 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 48- Ladd (Cattani) 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pannell Industries, Inc. Dallas-Fort Worth District 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.L. Smith Industrial Company 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.