Oil and gas well drilling services (redrilling, spudding, tailing) on a contract basis · Oklahoma

Cactus Drilling Rig 145

Oklahoma City, OK · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Oil and gas well drilling services (redrilling, spudding, tailing) on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade F.

Cactus Drilling Rig 145: 4.1 TCR = 216% of Oil and gas well drilling services (redrilling, spudding, tailing) on a contract basis BLS 1.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 safety composite

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2019→2024

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 injury rate improved

Cactus Drilling Rig 145's TCR fell 4.3 from 8.1 in 2019 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213111 · Oklahoma City, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.1 · 216% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #66/69
  • PHOTO Cactus Drilling Rig …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cactus Drilling Rig 108 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cactus Drilling Rig 145 averages 4.1 TCR (216% of the Oil and gas well drilling services (redrilling, spudding, tailing) on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 TCR series: 2019=8.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 1.9

Where Cactus Drilling Rig 145 falls in its industry

171 Oil and gas well drilling serv establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 69 Oil and gas well drilling serv employers in Oklahoma.

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 (23 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Cactus Drilling Rig 145
Cactus Drilling Rig 145 (23 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Cactus Drilling Rig 145 has fewer employees than the Oil and gas well drilling services (redr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2023 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213111 · OK · Oklahoma City

171 Oil and gas well drilling services (redrilling, spudding, tailing) on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cactus Drilling Rig 108 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rig 147 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rising River Inc 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cactus Drilling Rig 122 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PLUM THICKETT MULT SOW -EST 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP OKLAHOMA MAINT 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP OKLAHOMA GROUND MAINT 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broken Bow Hatchery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR 62039 - Capstone Us Foods Corona Ca 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bourne PS 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Conway AR FXFE-CWY 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR William Kelley High School 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wellsville - J. RETTENMAIER USA LP 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Qrp - Cdr 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE DED - PhilCorr 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Rapids Fiber J. RETTENMAIER USA LP 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.