Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · North Carolina

Cadence at Mooresville

Mooresville, NC · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cadence at Mooresville runs at 468% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cadence at Mooresville: 17.8 TCR = 468% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cadence at Mooresville safety composite

Cadence at Mooresville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cadence at Mooresville: 11.4 → 24.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 24.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2024

Cadence at Mooresville's TCR rose 12.7 from 11.4 in 2023 to 24.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mooresville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 468% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #102/105
  • PHOTO Morningside of Cleve…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morningside of Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cadence at Mooresville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cadence at Mooresville averages 17.8 TCR (468% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cadence at Mooresville TCR series: 2023=11.4 · 2024=24.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Cadence at Mooresville falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 105 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Cadence at Mooresville (61 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cadence at Mooresville
Cadence at Mooresville (61 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cadence at Mooresville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 24.1 12.1 5 1 0
2023 11.4 11.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Mooresville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 161 employers in Mooresville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Cleveland 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rose Court Assisted Living 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Ackerly at Reed's Crossing 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cumberland Crossings 17.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE H. F. Lee Energy Complex 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winston Salem Resource Center - PNG 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Division 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTFIELD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mooresville Graded School District 886 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGK Ceramics USA, Inc. 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR BestCo LLC 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR POWERHOME SOLAR 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Surface Creations of Maine LLC 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR QLS Apollo 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Buffalo 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MACCRAY Secondary 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Summit Hill Senior Living 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Training Structures 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wakefield Corporation 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollywood Super Market #2 LLC 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.