Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga runs at 554% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga: 21.0 TCR = 554% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga safety composite

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2023→2024

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga injury rate improved

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga's TCR fell 1.5 from 21.8 in 2023 to 20.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=21.8 · 2024=20.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.0 · 554% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #204/216
  • PHOTO Canyon Creek Memory …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Canyon Creek Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga averages 21.0 TCR (554% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga TCR series: 2023=21.8 · 2024=20.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga (80 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga
Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga (80 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.3 7.6 8 0 0
2023 21.8 1.7 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Canyon Creek Memory Care 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maplewood at Danbury LLC 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Virginia 21.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chaska Heights Senior Living 20.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Waell - Ellensburg 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Steelking Erectors 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St Paul Vending 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR COD010 21.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palm Beach 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Computer Development, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 250 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston Gas Operations 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.