Commercial building construction · Texas

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin

Austin, TX · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin: 1.1 TCR = 38% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin safety composite

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2023

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin injury rate improved

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.3 · 2020=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #126/327
  • PHOTO Tidewater Commercial…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tidewater Commercial Ceilings & Walls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cadence McShane Construction - Austin averages 1.1 TCR (38% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.3 · 2020=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Cadence McShane Construction - Austin falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 327 Commercial building constructi employers in Texas.

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin (60 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Cadence McShane Construction - Austin
Cadence McShane Construction - Austin (60 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Cadence McShane Construction - Austin has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Austin

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tidewater Commercial Ceilings & Walls 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCCo-BOS 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Threecore, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedlot Dublin LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 1 Complex 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACRT, Inc. Arlington TX 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VES Survey International 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR BT Winter Park 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ferrara Candy 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PDQ Manufacturing 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 101 Station Landing 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ARC Industries North 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Location - Main 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackman Inc/dba New Tech Metals 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.E.M. Group, Inc. 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.