General Warehousing and Storage · California

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution

Bloomington, CA · ~79 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution: 2.6 TCR = 45% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution safety composite

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2019→2024

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution injury rate improved

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution's TCR fell 1.3 from 5.0 in 2019 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Bloomington, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.6 · 45% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #340/1131
  • PHOTO Dart Logistics Servi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dart Logistics Services - Dallas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution averages 2.6 TCR (45% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution TCR series: 2019=5 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #340 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution (79 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution
Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution (79 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cafan - Scs Tamarind High Distribution has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 1 0
2019 5.0 3.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Bloomington

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 71 employers in Bloomington, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dart Logistics Services - Dallas 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30850-CAPSTONE SMITHFIELD GREENFIELD 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 12128 Burke St 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-16047 Mountain Ave 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-RLTO 2,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SBD1 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 551 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR 923 1,150 FTE
NAT-TCR Richland 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 753 Loves Park 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Judicial Department 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CT Mechanical, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kymay - Maysville 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cogre - Greeley 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluford Jackson & Son, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aleve - Evergreen Center 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.