Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Texas

CalHar Construction, Inc.

Melissa, TX · ~77 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CalHar Construction, Inc. runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

CalHar Construction, Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 78% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CalHar Construction, Inc. safety composite

CalHar Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CalHar Construction, Inc.: 0.0 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

CalHar Construction, Inc.'s TCR rose 6.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Melissa, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 78% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #106/194
  • PHOTO Fox Excavating, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fox Excavating, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CalHar Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CalHar Construction, Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (78% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CalHar Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 2.8

Where CalHar Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 194 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Texas.

CalHar Construction, Inc. (77 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CalHar Construction, Inc.
CalHar Construction, Inc. (77 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

CalHar Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 2.2 6 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 4.3 2.1 4 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Melissa

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Melissa, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fox Excavating, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utility Contractors of America, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shook Construction - Westerly CEHRT Project 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR T.G. UTILITY COMPANY, INC. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FLOYDADA COOP GIN 2 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holman Well Service 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodlands Service Center 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Huntsville 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDDEN CONCRETE INC 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beam Concrete Construction, Inc. 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beam Polish, LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melissa 38 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 231 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S07437 - Waste Management Charlotte County 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Grading, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR All Types Elevators, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paradigm Construction Group of South Florida 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Branch 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA IL Rockford Technology Drive Plant 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE John A. Dalsin & Son, Inc. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.