Skilled nursing facilities · California

California Home for the Aged, Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~263 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Home for the Aged, Inc. runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

California Home for the Aged, Inc.: 16.4 TCR = 252% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Home for the Aged, Inc. safety composite

California Home for the Aged, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2021

California Home for the Aged, Inc. injury rate improved

California Home for the Aged, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 9.2 in 2017 to 8.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.2 · 2018=23.3 · 2019=22.0 · 2020=18.7 · 2021=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 252% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #661/739
  • PHOTO Father Baker Manor
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 229 inj
  • SIZE ~263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Father Baker Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Home for the Aged, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Home for the Aged, Inc. averages 16.4 TCR (252% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Home for the Aged, Inc. TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=23.3 · 2019=22 · 2020=18.7 · 2021=8.7 · BLS 6.5

Where California Home for the Aged, Inc. falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #661 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

California Home for the Aged, Inc. (263 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate California Home for the Aged, Inc.
California Home for the Aged, Inc. (263 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

California Home for the Aged, Inc. has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.7 3.3 32 0 0
2020 18.7 8.5 57 0 0
2019 22.0 5.5 64 0 0
2018 23.3 8.3 49 7 0
2017 9.2 5.5 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Fresno

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Father Baker Manor 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allen View Healthcare Center 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Gresham 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Our Lady of Perpetual Help 16.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corazon Del Campo 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabrera Contracting, Inc. 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3225_6213 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rancho Royal Oaks, LLC 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Advanced Construction Southwest of CA, Inc. 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eugene Police Department 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Caris Healthcare-Dickson,Tn 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-02810 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkview Home Health Care 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citizens Medical Center 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Texas Food 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE RLA Investments Inc 263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.