Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) · California

California Materials Inc

Stockton, CA · ~81 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Materials Inc runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) workplace, earning a grade D.

California Materials Inc: 8.0 TCR = 178% of Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Materials Inc safety composite

California Materials Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.5

2017→2024

California Materials Inc injury rate improved

California Materials Inc's TCR fell 15.5 from 16.9 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.9 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=10.3 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Stockton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.0 · 178% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #90/110
  • PHOTO Propane Delivery
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Propane Delivery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Materials Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Materials Inc averages 8.0 TCR (178% of the Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Materials Inc TCR series: 2017=16.9 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=10.3 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 4.5

Where California Materials Inc falls in its industry

1,130 Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, s establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 110 Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, s employers in California.

California Materials Inc (81 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate California Materials Inc
California Materials Inc (81 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

California Materials Inc has more employees than the Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.3 5.8 7 0 0
2021 8.7 3.5 5 0 0
2019 10.3 10.3 6 0 0
2018 8.4 2.1 1 3 0
2017 16.9 14.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · CA · Stockton

1,130 Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Propane Delivery 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quad Cities Location 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Petro Taino Transport Corp 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JEL LLC Transportation WA 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE STS Ranch LLC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. R CRAIN AND SONS, INC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramar 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR COH City Hall Annex 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5106 - AL Montgomery County 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR WEB Water Development Association, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Willoughby Industries, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stamped Products, Inc. 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Fashioned Kitchen 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE BayCare Behavioral Hlth Assoc (2620) 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITW Pro Brands - Tucker 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.