General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Minnesota

California Overland Ltd.

Wabasha, MN · ~197 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Overland Ltd. runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

California Overland Ltd.: 2.1 TCR = 48% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Overland Ltd. safety composite

California Overland Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

California Overland Ltd. injury rate improved

California Overland Ltd.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2019=1.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Wabasha, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #21/74
  • PHOTO Knight Refrigerated …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Knight Refrigerated Memphis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

California Overland Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Overland Ltd. averages 2.1 TCR (48% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Overland Ltd. TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2019=1 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 4.5

Where California Overland Ltd. falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 74 General freight trucking, long employers in Minnesota.

California Overland Ltd. (197 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate California Overland Ltd.
California Overland Ltd. (197 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

California Overland Ltd. has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.4 2 0 0
2023 3.9 3.5 9 0 0
2022 2.9 2.1 7 0 0
2021 3.0 2.6 8 0 0
2019 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2017 1.3 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MN · Wabasha

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 13 employers in Wabasha, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Knight Refrigerated Memphis 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTS Transportation, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennsylvania Corporate 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.D. Associates, LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Gas Distribution- Rogers, MN 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gagnon, Inc. 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blu Dot Design & Manufacturing 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBL Labs 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIAPP030 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health Wabasha 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR KPR U.S., LLC- Wabasha 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health Wabasha/ KPR US LLC 75 FTE
NAT-TCR Stephens Plumbing, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Droitcour Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eaton Steel Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockaway Recycling 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hospice and Palliative Care of Iredell County 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Plastics 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solera Senior Living 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DWA9 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.