Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · California

California Steel Services

San Bernardino, CA · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Steel Services runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade B.

California Steel Services: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Steel Services safety composite

California Steel Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

California Steel Services: 0.0 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.7× in 2024

California Steel Services's TCR rose 7.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 7.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · San Bernardino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Hoeganaes Corp
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hoeganaes Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Steel Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Steel Services averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Steel Services TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.3

Where California Steel Services falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in California.

California Steel Services (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate California Steel Services
California Steel Services (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

California Steel Services has fewer employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 3.7 4 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · CA · San Bernardino

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in San Bernardino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hoeganaes Corp 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Steel Rome 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WSP Taylor 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish Nebraska 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff Department 3,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT2 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transitional Assistance Department 2,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : ONT5 2,475 FTE
NAT-TCR First Coast Terminals 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Auburn 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MI03-UDX-FLUSHING 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Airside Technology Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Construction 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE GENENTECH Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woolace Electric Corp. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tegra Equipment 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.