Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing · California

California Vibratory Feeders

Anaheim, CA · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Vibratory Feeders runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

California Vibratory Feeders: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Vibratory Feeders safety composite

California Vibratory Feeders scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2024

California Vibratory Feeders injury rate improved

California Vibratory Feeders's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.7 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/12
  • PHOTO Alliance Machine Sys…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alliance Machine Systems International LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Vibratory Feeders in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Vibratory Feeders averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Vibratory Feeders TCR series: 2017=2.7 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where California Vibratory Feeders falls in its industry

361 Pneumatic tube conveyors manuf establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Pneumatic tube conveyors manuf employers in California.

California Vibratory Feeders (31 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate California Vibratory Feeders
California Vibratory Feeders (31 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

California Vibratory Feeders has fewer employees than the Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.7 4.4 2 0 0
2022 9.9 3.3 3 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 0 1 0
2020 12.4 9.3 3 1 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.7 0.0 0 1 0
2017 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · CA · Anaheim

361 Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alliance Machine Systems International LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson-Mayrath Clay Center 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Industries - SW 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Industries- Columbus 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlantic TNG, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ind School District 2683 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Center Harvest Plant 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ShopRite Of Wayne # 217 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accudyne Systems, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus East 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodruff & Sons, Inc.-IN 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE S & S Tool and Machine Co 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.