Central heating equipment and piping installation · Tennessee

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc.

Chattanooga, TN · ~84 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Central heating equipment and piping installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 44% of Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. safety composite

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/117
  • PHOTO Lawton Mechanical Co…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lawton Mechanical Contractors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (44% of the Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Central heating equipment and establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 117 Central heating equipment and employers in Tennessee.

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (84 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (84 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. has more employees than the Central heating equipment and piping ins median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TN · Chattanooga

5,793 Central heating equipment and piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lawton Mechanical Contractors 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Melgar Mechanical Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeBra-Kuempel Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wood Air Conditioning, LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woodstream Corporation Knoxville 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Nashville 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Division 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE M3 Technology Group, Inc. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC SPORTSWEAR 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fulfill 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR IBP of Miami 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CQ Insulation Orlando 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn by Marriott San Juan Isla Verde 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farm and Fleet of Urbana 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Extru-Tech, Inc. 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juneau Police Department 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.