Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing · Minnesota

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc.

Stacy, MN · ~24 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. safety composite

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. held a steady TCR band

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Stacy, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO Sumitomo Electric Wi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. falls in its industry

236 Printed circuit assemblies man establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Printed circuit assemblies man employers in Minnesota.

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. (24 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc.
Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. (24 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. has fewer employees than the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · MN · Stacy

236 Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 6 employers in Stacy, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electronic Evolution Technologies, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrimac Industries Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creation Technologies 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Services - Jackson 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stacy Pipe & Precast 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR RINKER - MSPCP 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northstar Specialties, Inc. 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wyoming Machine Inc 43 FTE
NAT-TCR Midland County 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Industrial Riggers Corp 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Almstead Tree & Shrub Care Company - New Rochelle, NY 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Pacific Management, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE NEI 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eye Care Specialists 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powers of Arkansas- NWA Office 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collins Machinery and Engineering Inc 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.