Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Calvary Fellowship Homes

Lancaster, PA · ~178 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Calvary Fellowship Homes runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Calvary Fellowship Homes: 7.7 TCR = 203% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Calvary Fellowship Homes safety composite

Calvary Fellowship Homes scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Calvary Fellowship Homes injury rate improved

Calvary Fellowship Homes's TCR fell 0.7 from 8.4 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=6.3 · 2024=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #137/257
  • PHOTO Fostrian Court
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fostrian Court (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Calvary Fellowship Homes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Calvary Fellowship Homes averages 7.7 TCR (203% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Calvary Fellowship Homes TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=6.3 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Calvary Fellowship Homes falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Calvary Fellowship Homes (178 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Calvary Fellowship Homes
Calvary Fellowship Homes (178 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Calvary Fellowship Homes has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.7 5.1 6 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 9 0 0
2021 6.3 6.3 8 0 0
2020 7.5 6.7 10 0 0
2019 7.4 6.7 10 0 0
2018 10.5 10.5 13 0 0
2016 8.4 5.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Lancaster

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fostrian Court 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glen Meadows Retirement 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAPLE POINTE SENIOR CARE 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Sarasota Bay Club 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE PurePenn d/b/a Trulieve 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Building Systems 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Industries LLC - Shell Maintenance - Monaca 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smithfield Foods 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Basler Turbo Conversions, LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NBC San Antonio Merchants, LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR South Haven Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR T.E.M. Group, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sconza Candy Company 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teague Electric 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 606 606SH 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Concord 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.