Electric power generation, nuclear · Maryland

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant

Lusby, MD · ~889 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade B.

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant: 0.8 TCR = 66% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant safety composite

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Lusby, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P11
  • PHOTO WCNOC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~889 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WCNOC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant averages 0.8 TCR (66% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (889 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (889 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 5.9 4.7 2 3 0
2021 0.2 0.0 0 2 0
2020 0.3 0.0 0 3 0
2019 0.3 0.1 2 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.3 0.0 1 2 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MD · Lusby

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Lusby, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WCNOC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Operations 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Constellation Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-SONGS Station 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Supply Chain : Middle River, MD 893 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDLDC - DC BUILDING 880 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCormick Hunt Valley Plant 879 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN2 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102148 - Cove Point LNG Export Terminal 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR COVE POINT 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100343 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT LANDOVER 0343 112 FTE
NAT-TCR Dayton Distribution 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Centauri Technologies, LP 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HES Wood River 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kokosing Materials, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BWI4 889 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Plant 889 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakland Management Corp. 889 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley View Casino & Hotel 889 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.