Petrochemical plant construction · Texas

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO

Longview, TX · ~175 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Petrochemical plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Petrochemical plant construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO safety composite

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Longview, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #164/216
  • PHOTO FHG, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FHG, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Petrochemical plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO falls in its industry

809 Petrochemical plant constructi establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 216 Petrochemical plant constructi employers in Texas.

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO (175 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO (175 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO has more employees than the Petrochemical plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · TX · Longview

809 Petrochemical plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FHG, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR C1622 - Lonestar Frac VI 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Performance Mechanical Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Energes Services LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallant Industrial 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE KenMor : KenMor - Houston 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Houston 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFW Conveyor Installation LLC 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Lahar - Harahan General Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bruker Scientific LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Knoxville Lab 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Barbasol, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avera Holy Family Hospital 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiwas - Wausau 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scecd - Us Inside Sales - Greenville 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pictsweet Company 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.