Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing · Texas

CAM Process Technologies

Katy, TX · ~107 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CAM Process Technologies runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CAM Process Technologies: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CAM Process Technologies safety composite

CAM Process Technologies scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CAM Process Technologies: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.27× in 2024

CAM Process Technologies's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Katy, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #59/208
  • PHOTO LaValley Industries
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LaValley Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CAM Process Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CAM Process Technologies averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CAM Process Technologies TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where CAM Process Technologies falls in its industry

316 Oil and gas field-type drillin establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 208 Oil and gas field-type drillin employers in Texas.

CAM Process Technologies (107 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CAM Process Technologies
CAM Process Technologies (107 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

CAM Process Technologies has more employees than the Oil and gas field-type drilling machiner median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 2 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Katy

316 Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 240 employers in Katy, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LaValley Industries 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HES Conroe 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameri-Fab OSHA Log 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Rubber Inc. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dallas Headquarters 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. - Permian Infrastructure Group 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE R3 Petroleum Contractors 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX Woodlands Timberloch 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manufacturing 2,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU5 1,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Igloo Products Corp 1,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Katy DC - Katy TX 1,215 FTE
NAT-TCR Hexcel Corporation 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith & Nephew Inc. Andover MA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR empirical foods, inc. - Corporate Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kerry Red Arrow Expo 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maple Manor Health and Rehabilitation 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grebe's Bakeries, Inc. 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresh Market Park City 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newport Payroll LLC 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.