Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Michigan

Cambridge North Healthcare Center

Clawson, MI · ~90 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cambridge North Healthcare Center runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Cambridge North Healthcare Center: 4.7 TCR = 73% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cambridge North Healthcare Center safety composite

Cambridge North Healthcare Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cambridge North Healthcare Center: 8.1 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2021

Cambridge North Healthcare Center's TCR rose 1.9 from 8.1 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Clawson, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.7 · 73% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #115/471
  • PHOTO Poplar Creek Senior …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Poplar Creek Senior Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cambridge North Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cambridge North Healthcare Center averages 4.7 TCR (73% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Cambridge North Healthcare Center TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=4 · 2021=10 · BLS 6.5

Where Cambridge North Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 471 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Michigan.

Cambridge North Healthcare Center (90 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cambridge North Healthcare Center
Cambridge North Healthcare Center (90 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cambridge North Healthcare Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.0 5.0 2 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 2 1 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2017 2.5 1.3 2 0 0
2016 8.1 1.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Clawson

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 9 employers in Clawson, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Poplar Creek Senior Care 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center-Klein 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Rehabilitation & Living 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eaton County Health and Rehabilitation Services 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Precision Material Handling Equipment LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Pigeon Paper Company 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 11457 Hannan Rd 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Granco Clark Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Point of Clawson 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 15 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Noble Fish 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR In2gro Technologies LLC 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwestern Mechanical - Tri State 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bland Farms, LLC. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Houston near the Galleria 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Abington Reldan Metals, LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lafayette Louisiana Plant 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Co-Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc. Tipton 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Power Plus, Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE BDL - Ground Ops 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.