Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Ohio

Cambridge Packaging Inc.

Cambridge, OH · ~78 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cambridge Packaging Inc. runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Cambridge Packaging Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 89% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cambridge Packaging Inc. safety composite

Cambridge Packaging Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2024

Cambridge Packaging Inc. injury rate improved

Cambridge Packaging Inc.'s TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Cambridge, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/109
  • PHOTO Cleveland Welch Pack…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleveland Welch Packaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Cambridge Packaging Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cambridge Packaging Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (89% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cambridge Packaging Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=4 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cambridge Packaging Inc. falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 109 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Ohio.

Cambridge Packaging Inc. (78 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Cambridge Packaging Inc.
Cambridge Packaging Inc. (78 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Cambridge Packaging Inc. has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2019 5.6 4.4 5 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2017 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2016 5.5 1.4 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OH · Cambridge

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 73 employers in Cambridge, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Welch Packaging 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Dallas 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Wisconsin LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RICHLAND, WA 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reptiles by Mack, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley Industrial Services at Kraton Polymers 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metcon Ltd 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wm. Kramer & Son, Inc 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center. 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3816-SI3778 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3262 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quanex IG Systems Cambridge 351 FTE
NAT-TCR CMD 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Bus Company, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express & Suites 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pewaukee Wi 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Walpole 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0771 Delray Beach 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0685 La Grange 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.