Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Georgia

camellia Gardens of life care

Thomasville, GA · ~115 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

camellia Gardens of life care runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

camellia Gardens of life care: 1.9 TCR = 29% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

camellia Gardens of life care safety composite

camellia Gardens of life care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2022→2024

camellia Gardens of life care injury rate improved

camellia Gardens of life care's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Thomasville, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/259
  • PHOTO Hagerstown
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hagerstown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

camellia Gardens of life care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows camellia Gardens of life care averages 1.9 TCR (29% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

camellia Gardens of life care TCR series: 2022=4.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where camellia Gardens of life care falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 259 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Georgia.

camellia Gardens of life care (115 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate camellia Gardens of life care
camellia Gardens of life care (115 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

camellia Gardens of life care has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 4.4 1.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Thomasville

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 71 employers in Thomasville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hagerstown 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brighton Care Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterview Nursing Care Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR dba: Diversicare of Luling (DeWitt/Diversicare Hillcrest, LLC) 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hinesville Project 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.M. Wilkerson Construction Co., Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miniat Foods LLC dba Ed Miniat LLC 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 77) 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARCHBOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 1,487 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flowers Bakeries, LLC 927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flowers Foods, Inc. 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Kingfisher 438 FTE
NAT-TCR Fay Southeast, S&B USA Construction 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR View, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Aluminum Co. Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nothing Bundt Cakes - Jackson-Flowood 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE JWP Secondary School 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams Group 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kasparian Underground, LLC 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Missoula Mt. 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.