Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Illinois

Camosy Inc.

Zion, IL · ~69 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Camosy Inc. runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Camosy Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 93% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Camosy Inc. safety composite

Camosy Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2024

Camosy Inc. injury rate improved

Camosy Inc.'s TCR fell 8.2 from 9.7 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Zion, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 93% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #113/169
  • PHOTO CML Specialties Broo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CML Specialties Broomfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Camosy Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Camosy Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (93% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Camosy Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.9

Where Camosy Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 169 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Illinois.

Camosy Inc. (69 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Camosy Inc.
Camosy Inc. (69 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Camosy Inc. has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2016 9.7 8.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · IL · Zion

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 32 employers in Zion, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CML Specialties Broomfield 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Ply Construction, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Texas Tiltwall 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowen & Watson, Inc. 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer HiBred International Inc. McLeansboro Production 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Litchfield 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2057-Centralia, IL (Monsanto Co.) 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hennepin Power Station 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zion Benton Township High School District 126 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zion Benton Township High School District #126 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3893 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3893 318 FTE
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Durham McPherson 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmer West Construction Company Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The de Moya Group 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur 10104 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE PSI3G, Inc., dba Partitions Specialties Inc 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE High Density Poly Enterprises INC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeBenedetto Ag 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopwood 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.