Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Michigan

Campbell Inc. Press Repair

Lansing, MI · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Campbell Inc. Press Repair runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Campbell Inc. Press Repair: 4.3 TCR = 204% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Campbell Inc. Press Repair safety composite

Campbell Inc. Press Repair scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Campbell Inc. Press Repair: 0.0 → 12.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2024

Campbell Inc. Press Repair's TCR rose 12.8 from 0.0 in 2020 to 12.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 204% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #82/114
  • PHOTO Dragon Products Odes…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dragon Products Odessa WTX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Campbell Inc. Press Repair in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Campbell Inc. Press Repair averages 4.3 TCR (204% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Campbell Inc. Press Repair TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 2.1

Where Campbell Inc. Press Repair falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 114 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Michigan.

Campbell Inc. Press Repair (22 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Campbell Inc. Press Repair
Campbell Inc. Press Repair (22 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Campbell Inc. Press Repair has fewer employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 6.4 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Lansing

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dragon Products Odessa WTX 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Georgia 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trupar America 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FW Office 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skymint Silo59 Production Facility 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRT Brighton 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cadillac Renewable Energy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benzonia 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR Pulaski County Fiscal Court 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Belle Plaine 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LeafGuard of Knoxville 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Packaging Co., Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midway Aircraft Instrument Corporation 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Deer Creek Sarasota 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chamberlain Group Inc (Addison DC) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita Falls Endoscopy Center 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.