Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Can Corporation of America

Blandon, PA · ~284 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Can Corporation of America runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Can Corporation of America: 6.2 TCR = 189% of Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Can Corporation of America safety composite

Can Corporation of America scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2019→2022

Can Corporation of America injury rate improved

Can Corporation of America's TCR fell 6.8 from 10.3 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.3 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Blandon, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #16/16
  • PHOTO Independent Can Comp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Independent Can Company-Conneaut (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Can Corporation of America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Can Corporation of America averages 6.2 TCR (189% of the Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Can Corporation of America TCR series: 2019=10.3 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Can Corporation of America falls in its industry

217 Aerosol cans, light gauge meta establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 16 Aerosol cans, light gauge meta employers in Pennsylvania.

Can Corporation of America (284 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Can Corporation of America
Can Corporation of America (284 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Can Corporation of America has more employees than the Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.4 0.9 10 5 0
2021 4.4 1.5 12 6 0
2020 6.9 1.6 18 7 0
2019 10.3 6.2 25 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · PA · Blandon

217 Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 21 employers in Blandon, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Independent Can Company-Conneaut 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rexam Beverage Can Kent 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Metal Packaging USA, Inc. - Terminal Island 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Main Facility 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE The AZEK Company - COREY STREET 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Accuride Erie 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE HQ Pittsburgh 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Playworld - Lewisburg 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giorgio Fresh Company Blandon 732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giorgio Fresh Company 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR GMC Farm 1 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giorgi Mushroom Farm 1 397 FTE
NAT-TCR Maumee Valley Fabricators, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0035-0035-01285 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0023-02636 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 516524-Norfolk Va Vmf 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Deere Cylinder Div. - Moline 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jewish Medical Center East 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE 240055-Bos-Chelsea Carrier Annex 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quidel Corporation - Manufacturing 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.