SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE) HOSPITALS · South Carolina

Cancer Centers - Eastside

Greenville, SC · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cancer Centers - Eastside runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE) HOSPITALS workplace, earning a grade B.

Cancer Centers - Eastside: 2.8 TCR = 72% of SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE) HOSPITALS BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cancer Centers - Eastside safety composite

Cancer Centers - Eastside scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cancer Centers - Eastside: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2020

Cancer Centers - Eastside's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/30
  • PHOTO Archer Rehabilitatio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Archer Rehabilitation, LLC (d/b/a UF Health Rehab Hospital) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cancer Centers - Eastside in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cancer Centers - Eastside averages 2.8 TCR (72% of the SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE) HOSPITALS BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cancer Centers - Eastside TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=5 · 2020=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Cancer Centers - Eastside falls in its industry

1,390 SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 30 SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC employers in South Carolina.

Cancer Centers - Eastside (71 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cancer Centers - Eastside
Cancer Centers - Eastside (71 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Cancer Centers - Eastside has fewer employees than the SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTA median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.2 1.6 1 1 0
2019 5.0 1.7 1 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · SC · Greenville

1,390 SPECIALTY (EXCEPT PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE) HOSPITALS employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Archer Rehabilitation, LLC (d/b/a UF Health Rehab Hospital) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suma Rehab Hospital, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2253-H4506 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana Extended Care Hospital of Lafayette 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edisto Electric Cooperative, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairfield Electric Cooperative, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Langston Construction LLC of the Piedmont 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roebuck Buildings Co., Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Davison Oil Company, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR GT Technologies Defiance 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cranford Rehab & Nursing Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fiske Brothers Refining Co. dba Lubriplate Lubricants Co. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dedicated - Anheuser-Busch 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaver Lake 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03738 - Lake County Material Recovery 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Target (WC USX TFL) 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.