Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities · Pennsylvania

Canterbury Place

Pittsburgh, PA · ~178 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Canterbury Place runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Canterbury Place: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Canterbury Place safety composite

Canterbury Place scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Canterbury Place injury rate improved

Canterbury Place's TCR fell 4.6 from 7.7 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=19.9 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #253/754
  • PHOTO Point Loma Rehabilit…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Point Loma Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Canterbury Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Canterbury Place averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Canterbury Place TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4 · 2023=19.9 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Canterbury Place falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skille establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #253 safest of 754 Nursing Care Facilities Skille employers in Pennsylvania.

Canterbury Place (178 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Canterbury Place
Canterbury Place (178 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Canterbury Place has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2023 19.9 9.9 6 0 0
2022 4.0 1.0 4 0 0
2021 4.4 1.5 9 0 0
2020 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.6 2.0 7 0 0
2017 5.6 2.1 8 0 0
2016 7.7 4.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Pittsburgh

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Point Loma Rehabilitation Center 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solaris Healthcare Celebration 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indian River Center 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FI - Sarasota, LLC 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 152310000 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE PurePenn d/b/a Trulieve 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main facility 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Curry Supply - Hollidaysburg 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Parkwood Village 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RET-SNW Store 10 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR J & J Ag Products, Inc 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR W1 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE S&C Electric Company Franklin 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCE Constructors, Inc. 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE National IN - 0801 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Ft Dodge 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.