Door and window, prefabricated, installation · California

Capitol Builders Hardware

Sacramento, CA · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Capitol Builders Hardware runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Door and window, prefabricated, installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Capitol Builders Hardware: 5.6 TCR = 200% of Door and window, prefabricated, installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Capitol Builders Hardware safety composite

Capitol Builders Hardware scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2021→2024

Capitol Builders Hardware injury rate improved

Capitol Builders Hardware's TCR fell 4.7 from 7.8 in 2021 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.8 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238350 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 200% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/66
  • PHOTO Green Shield Deck Bu…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Green Shield Deck Builders (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Capitol Builders Hardware in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Capitol Builders Hardware averages 5.6 TCR (200% of the Door and window, prefabricated, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Capitol Builders Hardware TCR series: 2021=7.8 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=7 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Capitol Builders Hardware falls in its industry

367 Door and window, prefabricated establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 66 Door and window, prefabricated employers in California.

Capitol Builders Hardware (57 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Capitol Builders Hardware
Capitol Builders Hardware (57 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Capitol Builders Hardware has more employees than the Door and window, prefabricated, installa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 7.0 4.7 3 0 0
2022 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 7.8 2.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238350 · CA · Sacramento

367 Door and window, prefabricated, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Green Shield Deck Builders 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Company of Burlington #348 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rochester Colonial Mfg. Corp. 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth Minnesota 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Central IL - Plant - 339 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bristol Metals 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Lumber Door Millwork Hub 389 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 78-Usf-Olf Carrollton 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hat Over the Wall Enterprises 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merc Acquisitions, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ormond in the Pines 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.