Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · California

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc.

Commerce, CA · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 197% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. safety composite

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2017→2021

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. injury rate improved

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.6 from 14.3 in 2017 to 8.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Commerce, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 197% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #61/96
  • PHOTO M&M Steel Erection Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M&M Steel Erection Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (197% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. TCR series: 2017=14.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 96 Structural steel erecting or i employers in California.

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc.
Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Capitol Steel Fabricators, Inc. has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.7 4.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 14.3 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Commerce

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 163 employers in Commerce, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M&M Steel Erection Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WCI, INC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mohawk Re-Bar Services 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferguson Complex 2,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 587 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCAM, LLC 1,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DLA3 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Bailey Bridge (#25) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Impressions Incorporated-Hutchinson 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mankato Packaging 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago (ORD) 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1096 Wood Dale FPD 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Furniture Rental-Miami 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nefab 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peter Mangone, Inc. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.